Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Venu Vs Prasanth — Property and Title | Kerala HC (2016)

Home
Kerala HC
2016
Venu Vs PrasanthVenu v. Prasanth

Disposed

Venu v. Prasanth

Kerala HC5 Feb 2016OP(C)/326/2016

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/16TH MAGHA, 1937

OP(C).No. 326 of 2016 (O)

-------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CMA.NO. 2/2014 OF ADDL.SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA) (OS.NO.812/2013 OF MUNSIFF COURT, KODUNGALLUR)

PETITIONERS:

1. VENU, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.SASTHAVUNGAL PONNU ACHARI,

METHALA VILLAGE DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK.

2. RAMAKRISHNAN, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.SASTHAVUNGAL PONNU ACHARI,

METHALA VILLAGE DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
VENU
petitioner
RAMAKRISHNAN
respondent
PRASANTH
respondent
VINEETHA G PAI

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 5 Feb 2016 · February
Registered: 1 Feb 2016
Case no.: OP(C)/326/2016

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from K.abraham Mathew

Sudheer Bose Vs Shajahan
4 Feb 2016
Yagasthala Educational Trust of India Vs the South Indian Bank
4 Feb 2016
M.R.Gopi Vs Kochuthressia
4 Feb 2016
Vipin @ Lal Vs State of Kerala
5 Feb 2016

Cite this judgement

Venu v. Prasanth, OP(C)/326/2016 (KL), decided on 5 February 2016.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

Parties & counsel

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)

RESPONDENTS:

1. PRASANTH, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.KARANCHERI MADOM RAVEENDRANADHA SHENOY, METHALA VILLAGE DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK- 680 001

2. VINEETHA G PAI, AGED 33 YEARS, D/O.SIVAPRAPHAYIL GOPINADHA PAI, METHALA VILLAGE DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK -680 001

THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

OP(C).No. 326 of 2016 (O)

APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

P1:A TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS NO.812/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, KODUNGALLUR DTD 20/5/2013

P2:A TRUE COPY OF THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND PLAN IN EXT P1 SUIT DTD 22/5/2013

P3:A TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE DEFENDANTS IN EXT P1 DTD 23/7/2013

P4:A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED IN IA NO.703 OF 2013 IN EXT P1 SUIT DTD 1/1/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, KODUNGALLUR

P5:A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM IN CMA NO.2 OF 2014 DTD 6/1/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA

P6:A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CMA NO.2 OF 2014 DTD 21/11/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SUB COURT IRINJALAKUDA

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL

/TRUE COPY/

P.A.TO JUDGE

sts

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

O.P.(C) No.326 of 2016

Dated this the 5^th day of February, 2016

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up for hearing, it was submitted that the suit has been included in the list of cases for trial for the month of March 2016. So it is sufficient that a direction is issued to the trial court to dispose of the suit before the court closes for summer vacation in 2016 untrammelled by any of the observations in the impugned order and judgment. The appellate court shall forthwith transmit the records to the trial court. This original petition is closed.

Sd/-

STK

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. JUDGE

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

CNR

KLHC010338182016

Topic

Property and Title

Bench

K.abraham Mathew

Disposal

CLOSED

5 Feb 2016

M/S.Kamakshy Constructions Vs Rajesh Gopalakrishnan

5 Feb 2016