N.E. Balakrishna Marar v. Payyoli Meethal Laila
Case brief
What is this about?
Original Civil Petitions were closed following a settlement between parties at mediation. The court directed the joint statement to be sent to the lower court for decree.
What did the court decide?
Original petitions closed upon settlement; joint statement to be sent to lower court; parties directed to apply to record compromise.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/29TH POUSHA, 1937
OP(C).No. 427 of 2015 ()
I.A. NO.2180/2014 IN A.S. NO.197/2007 OF FIRST ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE.
PETITIONER(S):
1. N.E.BALAKRISHNA MARAR, AGED 81 YEARS, S/O. KUNHIKRISHNA MARAR, RESIDING AT KASABA AMSOM AND DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
2. M. SAROJAM, AGED 72 YEARS, W/O.N.E.BALAKRISHNA MARAR, RESIDING AT KASABA AMSOM AND DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
3. N.E. MANOHARAN, AGED 49 YEARS S/O.N.E.BALAKRISHNA MARAR, RESIDING AT KASABA AMSOM AND DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
4. N.E. ANITHA, AGED 45 YEARS, D/O.N.E.BALAKRISHNA MARAR, RESIDING AT KASABA AMSOM AND DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.E.BALAKRISHNA MARAR and others
- respondent
PAYYOLI MEETHAL LAILA
Coram
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court