Pathumma v. Janardhanan
Case brief
What is this about?
A petitioner sought a perpetual injunction over a disputed strip of land but challenged the trial court's dismissal of her application to appoint a commissioner. The High Court upheld the dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed; application for appointment of commissioner rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2016/2ND MAGHA, 1937
OP(C).No. 34 of 2016 (O)
IA NO. 705/2015 IN OS 41/2013 of MUNSIFF COURT, PAYYOLI
PETITIONER :
------------------
PATHUMMA, AGED 67 YEARS,W/O.MOHAMMED, NADUKANDI HOUSE, THRIKKOTTOOR AMSOM, DESOM, KOYILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) SRI.PRASANTH M.P
RESPONDENTS :
----------------------
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appointment of a commissioner is necessary when title deed description suffices to resolve the boundary dispute.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PATHUMMA
- respondent
JANARDHANAN
- respondent
RAVEENDRAN
- respondent
RAGHU
- respondent
USHA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court