Bincy Jeo v. Saramma
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Kerala allowed petitioners to continue occupying premises until 10.04.2016 conditionally upon filing an affidavit undertaking to vacate by that date, with the executing court authorized to execute the decree if the undertaking is not filed.
What did the court decide?
Allowed petitioners to occupy premises till 10.04.2016 on filing an affidavit undertaking to vacate; executing court to execute decree if undertaking not filed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2016/2ND MAGHA, 1937
OP(C).No. 1780 of 2015 (O)
E.P. NO.651/2013 IN OS. NO.1958/2011 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, THRISSUR.
PETITIONERS/JUDGMENT DEBTORS NO. 1 TO 3:
1. BINCY JEO, W/O.JEO, AGED 34 YEARS, PALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANNUKKAD DESOM, VILVATTOM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
2. JOBIN JEO (MINOR) AGED 10 YEARS, S/O.JEO, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN BINCY JEO, W/O.JEO, PALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANNUKKAD DESOM, VILVATTOM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
3. JISNA JEO (MINOR) AGED 6 YEARS, D/O. JEO, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN BINCY JEO, W/O.JEO, PALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANNUKKAD DESOM, VILVATTOM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners may continue occupying the premises pending execution of a partition-related document.
Conditions for vacating the premises and undertakings required from the judgment debtors.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BINCY JEO
- petitioner
JOBIN JEO (MINOR)
- petitioner
JISNA JEO (MINOR)
- respondent
SARAMMA
- respondent
LEO
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court