S.Valsala v. Idukki District Panchayath
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed an original petition as infructuous on 23-05-2016 after recording the submissions of the counsel appearing for the petitioner.
The High Court of Kerala dismissed an original petition as infructuous on 23-05-2016 after recording the submissions of the counsel appearing for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2016/2ND JYAISHTA, 1938
O.P.No.26913 of 2002 (D)
PETITIONER(S):-
S.VALSALA, WIDOW OF LATE APPUKUTTAN, AGED 39 YEARS, NELLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, OONNUKAL , CANCEL BLOCK, KALLAR P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD
SRI.GEORGE G.POOTHICOTE
RESPONDENT(S):-
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-05-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. Vinod Chandran, J
O.P.No.26913 of 2002-D
Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2016
JUDGMENT
Recording the submission of the learned Counsel
appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition would stand
dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
vku/-
[ true copy ]
S. VALSALA, WIDOW OF LATE APPUKUTTAN
THE IDUKKI DISTRICT PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
CANCEL BLOK SUDHA JALA VITHARANA COMMITTEE, KALLAR, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR SRI. SURESH
SMT. SARASAMMA, W/O. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMKANDAM POLICE STATION
K.Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court