A.K.Asharaff v. Joseph
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court refused to set aside the trial court's order dismissing a status quo application but directed the issuance of a certified copy of the judgment and restrained respondents from obstructing the petitioner's easement right for two weeks.
What did the court decide?
Direction to issue certified copy without delay; temporary restraint on respondents from obstructing pathway for two weeks or until appeal filed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/7TH MAGHA, 1937
OP(C).No. 238 of 2016 (O)
IA.NO.77/2016 IN OS.NO.199/2012 OF MUNSIFF COURT, THODUPUZHA
PETITIONER(S):
A.K.ASHARAFF, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O. KUNJUTHAMPI, ANTHINATTU HOUSE, THODUPUZHA KARA, THODUPUZHA VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENT(S):
1. JOSEPH, S/O. MATHAI, NELLIKKATTU HOUSE, NADUKANDAM KARA, THODUPUZHA VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 001.
2. PUNNOOSE,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dismissing the status quo application should be set aside to allow issuance of certified copy and temporary maintenance of status quo.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.K. ASHARAFF
- respondent
JOSEPH
- respondent
PUNNOOSE
- respondent
MATHEWS
- respondent
SHAJI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court