This original petition claiming entitlement to consideration for an Apprentice Section Engineer post along with Scheduled Caste category was ultimately dismissed as infructuous because the writ petition against which it was supplementary had lapsed.
Dismissed the original petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2016/1ST CHAITHRA, 1938
OP.No. 18741 of 2000 (F)
PETITIONER:
RAJESH S., AGED 26 YEARS, S/O. SATHY T.A. THUNDIYIL HOUSE, ERAMALLOOR P.O., CHERTHALA
BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SAJEEV
RESPONDENTS:
THE RAILWAY RECRUITMENT, BOARD REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, OFFICE OF THE RAILWAY RECRUITMENT BOARD, THAMPANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
BY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS J.NEDUMPARA,SC, RAILWAYS
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JJJ
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
O.P. No. 18741 of 2000 (F)
Dated this the 21st day of March, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The Original Petition is filed claiming entitlement
to be considered in the Employment Notice No. TVC/5/99 dated 12.06.1999, issued by the Southern
Railway. The post to which the petitioner desired consideration was Apprentice Section Engineer/ Electrical (Category No.501). The consideration was also sought under the Scheduled Caste category. No interim order was granted.
At this stage, nothing survives in the writ petition. The writ petition would stand dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE //True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
jjj 21/3/16
RAJESH S.
THE RAILWAY RECRUITMENT BOARD REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
K.VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
