Sudha v. Harison Bhallad
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the trial court to consider petitions challenging an ex parte decree and condoning delay within two weeks, staying execution proceedings until disposal.
What did the court decide?
The trial court to pass orders on petitions to set aside the ex parte decree within two weeks; execution proceedings stayed till disposal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2016/22ND ASHADHA, 1938
OP(C).No. 1617 of 2016 (O) --------------------------EP NO. 170/2015 IN OS 367/1995 of PRL.MUNSIFF COURT, NEDUMANGAD
PETITIONER(S)/4TH ADDL. JUDGMENT DEBTOR/ 4TH ADDL. DEFENDANT:
SUDHA, AGED 35 YEARS, D/O NESSAMMA, MARUTHUMOODU VEEDU, AARAMPALLY, ANAD MURI, ANAD VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT(S)/4TH ADDL. DECREE HOLDEER/4TH ADDL. PLAINTIFF:
HARISON BHALLAD, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O JOHNSON, MARUTHUMOODU PUTHEN VEEDU, AARAMPALLY, ANAD MURI, ANAD VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 103.
BY ADVS. SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. SRI.G.P.SHINOD
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the execution proceedings should be stayed pending disposal of applications to set aside an ex parte decree and to condone delay.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUDHA
- respondent
HARISON BHALLAD
Coram
K. HARILAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court