Raphel v. Treesa
Case brief
What is this about?
This order addressed the disposal of a pending appeal involving land tribunal files already sent to the tribunal, directing the District Court to dispose within three months.
What did the court decide?
Directed the District Court, Ernakulam, to dispose of Appeal No. 89 of 2007 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the judgment.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2016/21ST ASHADHA, 1938
OP(C).No. 855 of 2016 (O)
IA.5775/2015 IN AS.89/2007 OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER(S):
RAPHEL,
AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.CICILY CHEEKU, NEDUMPARAMBIL HOUSE, KUNDANNOOR DESOM, MARADU-682 304.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.VINOD BHAT SRI.LEGITH T.KOTTAKKAL
RESPONDENT(S):
1. TREESA, DAUGHTER OF LATE RAPHEL, NEDUNILATHU HOUSE, KUNDANNOOR, MARADU-682 304.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the District Court to dispose of a pending appeal within a specific timeframe due to undue delay.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAPHEL
- respondent
TREESA
- respondent
EMILY ANTONY
- respondent
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS (RE-SURVEY)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court