S.P.Natarajan v. Fousiya
Case brief
What is this about?
The Motor Accident Claims Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as no representation was filed despite granted time to cure defects.
What did the court decide?
Neither the appeal nor the underlying claim was disposed of on merits; the appeal proceedings were terminated for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/30TH KARTHIKA, 1938
MACA.No. 693 of 2013
OP(MV) 300/2007 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM TRIBUNAL, MUVATTUPUZHA DATED 31-08-2010
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.1:
S.P.NATARAJAN, S/O.PARAMESWARAN, SHANTHI BHAVAN, VALARA, MANNANKANDAM VILLAGE.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.ARUN KUMAR SMT.M.N.MAYA
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER & 2ND RESPONDENT:
1. FOUSIYA,
D/O.HUSSAIN, MANGATTU HOUSE, ADIMALI, NOW RESIDING AT MANGALASSERY HOUSE, PEERIKKANNI, KUTTAMANGALAM VILLAGE - 686 673.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.P.NATARAJAN
- respondent
FOUSIYA
- respondent
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court