Dismissed
S. Rehna v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCWP(C)/7381/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/25TH KARTHIKA, 1938
WP(C).No. 7381 of 2006 (D)
PETITIONER(S):
S. REHNA, D/O.T.ELAYAKUNJU, AGED 36 YEARS, HEADMISTRESS, HAJI HASSAN YACOOB SAIT MEMORIAL UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, KUTEETHERUVU, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.R.AVINASH (KUNNATH) SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14.
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ALAPPUZHA.
4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MAVELIKKARA.
5. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
6. THE MANAGER, HAJI HASSAN YACOOB SAIT MEMORIAL UPPER PRIMARY SCOOL, KUTEETHERUVU, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
7. SMT. DEEPAKUMARI, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, HAJI HASSAN YACOOB SAID MEMORIAL UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, KUTTITHERUVU, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
R1-5 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SANTHOSH PETER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
P.V.ASHA, J.
W.P.(C) No.7381 of 2006
Dated this the 16th day of November, 2016
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition
is not pressed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA
JUDGE
rkc
True copy
PA to Judge
S. Rehna
State of Kerala
P.V. Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court