Padmini v. Krishnankutty
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge court dismissed a civil revision petition (CRP No. 522 of 2013) as not pressed by the learned counsel. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/14TH MAGHA, 1937
CRP.No. 522 of 2013 ()
IA NO. 710/2011 IN OS NO. 15/2009 PASSED BY THE MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO 3/PLAINTIFF NO 3 :
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------
PADMINI, D/O.PULAKKAL VEETTIL LATE KARUPPAN KARAKKAD AMSOM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1,2,4 & 5/DEFENDANT NO 1 AND PLAINTIFFS 1,2 AND 4:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Padmini
- respondent
Krishnankutty
- respondent
Pankajakshi
- respondent
Padmavathy
- respondent
Radhamani
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court