Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Fausine E. Francis Vs v.Senthil — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2016)

Home
Kerala HC
2016
Fausine E. Francis Vs v.SenthilFausine E. Francis v. v.Senthil

Dismissed

Fausine E. Francis v. v.Senthil

Kerala HC8 Dec 2016Con.Case(C)/885/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner reported compliance with the impugned order in a contempt case. The court accepted the submission and closed the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The contempt of court case was closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938

Con.Case(C).No. 885 of 2016 (S)

ORDER DTD.21.12.2015 IN WPC.35289/2015

PETITIONER(S)/2ND PETITIONER:

FAUSINE E. FRANCIS, AGED 29, W/O.ROBIN JOSEPH, HSST JUNIOR IN COMPUTER APPLICATION, ST. JOSEPH'S HSS FOR GIRL, ALAPPUZHA-688 001.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANKARANKUTTY NAIR SRI.VENU MENON SRI.K.SANDESH RAJA

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 - 3: --------------------------------

1. V.SENTHIL, FATHER'S NAME & AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, (PRINCIPAL SECRETARY), GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
FAUSINE E. FRANCIS
respondent
V. SENTHIL
respondent
MOHAN KUMAR
respondent
MINI S.

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 8 Dec 2016 · December
Registered: 8 Jun 2016
Case no.: Con.Case(C)/885/2016

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from K.vinod Chandran

Jayasree v. Vs K.K. Jalan
7 Dec 2016
Naicymol C.S. Vs Remani
7 Dec 2016
M.v.George Vs State of Kerala
7 Dec 2016
Shakeer K.M. Vs R.Girija IAS
8 Dec 2016
P.Bhaktavalsalan Vs the Kozhikode Corporation.

Cite this judgement

Fausine E. Francis v. v.Senthil, Con.Case(C)/885/2016 (KL), decided on 8 December 2016.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

K. VINOD CHANDRAN

Parties & counsel

Outcome

The contempt of court case was closed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

In a contempt of court case where the petitioner submitted that the order dated 21.12.2015 was complied with and Annexure A1 of the appendix was verified, this Court accepted the submission and held that the contempt of court case would stand closed. No substantive legal proposition was laid down; the order was a procedural closure.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

2. MOHAN KUMAR, (FATHER'S NAME & AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SHANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

3. MINI S., (FATHER'S NAME & AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, VAYASKARAKUNNU, NEAR MODEL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KOTTAYAM-686 001.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

msv/

Con.Case(C).No. 885 of 2016 (S)

APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:

ANNEX 1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN IA.NO.18165/2015 IN WPC.NO.35289/2015 DTD.21.12.2015. ANNEX 2 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER G.O.(RT) NO.1651/2016/G.EDN. DTD.12.5.2016.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURE -----------------------

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.S.TO JUDGE

msv/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== Contempt of Court Case No.885 of 2016 - S in W.P.(C) No.35289 of 2015

=============================== Dated this the 08^th day of December, 2016

J U D G M E N T

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that

Annexure A1 order dated 21.12.2015 has already been complied with.

The contempt of court case hence would stand closed.

Sd/-

K. VINOD CHANDRAN,

JUDGE

SB/09/12/2016.

// true copy //

P.A to Judge

K. VINOD CHANDRAN

CNR

KLHC010115742016

Topic

Contempt of Court

Bench

K.vinod Chandran

Disposal

CLOSED

8 Dec 2016

Edakandan Saithalavi Vs State of Kerala

8 Dec 2016