In this contempt case, the petitioner submitted that the earlier order was complied with. The High Court accepted this submission and closed the proceeding without delivering any further substantive reasoning or finding.
Proclamation of contempt dismissed as order was found complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/16TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1020 of 2015 (S)
THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.5457/2014 DATED 04-03-2014.
PETITIONER:
JAYASREE V., AGED 61 YEARS, ASSISTANT MANAGER (RETD), W/O.P.V. SETHUMADHAVAN, PUTHENVEETTIL HOUSE, NO.28/1795, THOTTUMGATHARA ROAD, KADAVANTHRA. P.O, ERNAKULAM-682 020.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.SANJITH, SMT.C.S.SINDHU KRISHNAH.
RESPONDENTS:
1. K.K. JALAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE CHIEF PROVIDENT COMMISSIONER, THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, 14, BHIKAJI CAMA PALACE, NEW DELHI-110 066.
2. ARIF LOHANI, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.
BY SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE. ADV. SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SC.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
Con.Case(C).No. 1020 of 2015 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:-
ANNEXURE A1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A. NO.1972/2014 DATED 05/01/2015.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:-
ANNEXURE R1 COPY OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT DATED 09/07/2015 IN SLP(C) CC NO.12014/2015.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
rs.
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1020 of 2015 (S)
Dated: 07th December, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that
the order is complied.
Recording the said submission, the contempt
case is closed.
Sd/K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
jjj 8/12/16
JAYASREE V.
K.K. JALAN
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
