Vijayan Pillai S. v. Arshad M.
Case brief
What is this about?
Clerk filed contempt for non-compliance with stay order regarding pay revision. Court cleared the petitioner as stay was contingent on writ outcome. Contempt case closed.
What did the court decide?
contempt case closed
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/18TH JYAISHTA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 805 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).28078/2014
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C).28078/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 28-10-2014
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
-----------------------------------
VIJAYAN PILLAI S. SECRETARY, VEMBAYAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. KONCHIRA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695614.
BY ADVS.SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM
SMT.NISHA GEORGE
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner justified in proceeding against the Joint Registrar with a contempt petition for failing to revise his pay during a pending writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vijayan Pillai S.
- respondent
Arshad M.
Coram
K. Vinod Chandra N
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court