Contempt case disposed of after petitioner submitted that the impugned judgment in the underlying writ petition was complied with.
Contempt case closed and dismissed due to compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/17TH JYAISHTA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 518 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).15608/2015
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 15608/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 03-08-2015
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
R.RAJESH AGED 45 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S. SAKTHI ENTERPRISES, S/O. R.RAJENDRANATHAN NAIR, SAKTHI PAZHAVEEDU P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 688 009.
BY ADV. SRI.ANIL GEORGE
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
1. SRI.AJITH BHAGAVATH RAO PATEL MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALABHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. SRI.RAJAMANIKYAM I.A.S DISTRICT COLLECTOR & SECRTARY, GIDA (LSGD), COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD - 682 030.
3. SRI.K.M.ABRAHAM SECRETARY TO FINANCE, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
4. SRI.MUHAMMED HANEESH SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001
R1 BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY R2 BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE K.PAUL
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 518 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).15608/2015 -----------------------------------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 3.08.15 IN W.P.(C) NO.15608/2015 ANNEXURE B COPY OF THE EXTENSION ORDER DATED 21.1.16 IN I.A NO.206/16.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE R4(A) COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 4.3.16 // TRUE COPY //
P.A TO JUDGE
SB
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
=====================
Contempt of Court Case No.518 of 2016 - S
=============================== Dated this the 07th day of June, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that
Annexure A judgment dated 03.08.2015 has been complied
with. In such circumstance, the contempt of court case would
stand closed.
Sd/JUDGE
K. VINOD CHANDRAN,
SB/07/06/2016
// true copy //
P.A to Judge
R.Rajesh
Ajith Bhagavath Rao Patel
Rajamanikyam
K.M.Abraham
Muhammed Haneesh
K.Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
