V.K.Sunny v. Murali Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court proceeding, the court recorded that directions given in the main writ petition had been complied with and this proceeding was closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt proceedings were closed as directions were complied with.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/5TH PHALGUNA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 80 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).24610/2015
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 24610/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 13-08-2015
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
V.K.SUNNY, S/O.KURIAKOSE, AGED 40 VADAKAN HOUSE, KAVEED, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
MURALI KRISHNAN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER CUM SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR - 680 003.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.K. Sunny
- respondent
Murali Krishnan
- respondent
The Regional Transport Officer Cum Secretary
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court