In this contempt of court case, the petitioner submitted that the direction in the underlying judgment has been complied with. The court recorded the compliance and closed the contempt case.
The contempt case is closed after recording compliance with the direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/20TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 756 of 2016 (S)
---------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 31323/2015 DATED 27-10-2015)
PETITIONER :
ABDUL REHMAN A.P., S/O. ASANKUTTY, AGED 67 YEARS, A.P.HOUSE, VADAKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.V.PREMCHAND
RESPONDENT :
PADMAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 56, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA SIDCO, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, SRI.R.T.PRADEEP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC.NO.756/2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX 1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27/10/2015 IN WP(C).NO.31323/2015.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
Cont. Case (C) No. 756 of 2016
Dated this the 11th day of November, 2016
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted that the direction in the judgment
has been complied with. Therefore, the contempt case is
closed, recording compliance.
Sd/-
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
bka/-
ABDUL REHMAN A.P.
PADMAKUMAR
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
