Disposed

Thankamony K. v. Babu

Kerala HC10 Nov 2016Con.Case(C)/1530/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt case (Con.C) No. 1530 of 2016, the High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam, on November 10, 2016, held that the judgment in a related contempt case was complied with. The Court directed that other projected issues be resolved in separate proceedings initiated by the second respondent. The case was subsequently closed.

What did the court decide?

No orders for any penalty or specific relief; the contempt case was closed.

Thankamony K. Vs Babu — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/19TH KARTHIKA, 1938

¶5

Con.Case(C).No. 1530 of 2016 (S)

¶6

WP(C) 6824/2016 DATED 23-02-2016 -----------------

¶7

PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ----------------------

¶8

THANKAMONY K, S/O.KUNJU KRISHNAN NADAR, AGED 50 YEARS, VARUVILAKOM PUTHAN VEEDU HOUSE, KONNANNURKONAM, KUNNATHUKAL, KARAKONAM PO, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT.695504.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS SMT.MISHAL M.DASAN

¶10

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT IN WPC:

¶11

1. BABU, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME IS NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER), VILLAGE OFFICER, KUNNATHUKAL VILLAGE, KUNNATHUKAL PO, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT-695504.

¶12

2. Y.L. SUGATHAN, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME IS NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER), SECRETARY, KUNNATHUKAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KARAKONAM PO, 695 504, TRIVANDRUM DT.

¶13

R1 SENIOR BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI S.GOPINATHAN R2 BY ADVS. SRI.C.E.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.M.P.PRABHAKARAN (PALAKKAD)

¶14

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

K.V.

¶16

COC NO 1530 OF 2016:

¶17

APPENDIX

¶18

PETITIONERS ANNEXURES:

¶19

ANNEXURE-A: COPY OF INTIMATION GIVEN BY THE PANCHAYATH TO THE PETITIONER DATED 13.11.2014. ANNEXURE-B: COPY OF REPORT DATED 28.9.15 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER TO THE PANCHAYATH. ANNEXURE-C: COPY OF SKETCH PREPARED BY THE TALUK SURVEYOR DATED 25.9.15. ANNEXURE-D: COPY OF LETTER DATED 21.11.2015 ISSUED BY THE PANCHAYAT. ANNEXURE-E: COPY OF REQUEST SENT TO THE VILLAGE OFFICER DATED 10.11.2015. ANNEXURE-F: CERTIFIED COPY JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.6824/2016 DATED 23.2.16. ANNEXURE-G: COPY OF REPORT DATED 16-2016 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE-H: COPY OF SKETCH DATED 1-6-2016 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

¶20

EXHIBIT R2(A): COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED IN APPENDIX E UNDER RULE 22(I) DATED 30/12/2013.

/TRUE COPY/

P.A.TO JUDGE

K.V.

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

¶25

Cont. Case (C) No. 1530 of 2016

¶26

Dated this the 10^th day of November, 2016

¶27

J U D G M E N T

¶28

In the light of the submissions made at the Bar, this Court is of the view that the judgment has been complied with. Rest of the issues now projected before this Court

¶29

is a matter that could be thrashed out in other proceedings, if initiated by the 2^nd respondent

¶30

Panchayath. Therefore, the contempt case is closed.

¶31

Sd/-

¶32

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE

¶33

bka/-

Thankamony K. v. Babu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thankamony K. v. Babu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Seablue Shipyard Limited Vs Ganesh

Jom C.Michael Vs Smt.v.R.Latha

Rangorath Gokul Prasad Vs Sri. C.Jayan

Dharmadam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Vs Joint Registrar (General) in Charge of

Mary, W/O.M.a. Ouseph Vs the Thalassery Primary Co. Op.Agrl.

Vakkom Farmers' Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Vs Smt. Sindhu S.