Murukan v. Mallika
Case brief
What is this about?
A review petitioner challenged the revenue authority's transfer of registry, filed after the Court directed it based on a civil decree. The Court held that post-event challenges acts by revenue authorities should be challenged separately, dismissing the review petition.
What did the court decide?
Review petition dismissed; liberty granted to challenge Tahsildar's action by separate proceedings.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/8TH BHADRA, 1938
RP.No. 734 of 2016 () IN WP(C).14223/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 14223/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 07-04-2016
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/ 3RD PARTY:
MURUKAN THONARIL, AGED 65 YEARS, SON OF LATER SHRI.ITTAMAN, THONARIL VEEDU, KANINADU PO, KUTTA KARA, 682 310
BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL S.RAJ
SMT.ANILA PETER SMT.K.N.RAJANI SRI.RADHIKA RAJASEKHARAN P.
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review petition is maintainable to challenge subsequent action by the revenue authority taken pursuant to direction of this Court?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Murukan Thonaril
- respondent
Mallika Somasundaran
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
District Collector, Ernakulam
- respondent
Additional Tahsildar, Kunnathunad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court