Abdul Kalam v. Rajkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed a filed contempt petition because the original judgment against petitioners was recalled by a subsequent order dated 12.04.2016, rendering the contempt proceedings moot.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/23RD CHAITHRA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 682 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).10996/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 10996/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 22.03.2016
PETITIONERS:
1. ABDUL KALAM, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. HIDROSE, OVERSEAR, KSEB ELECTRICAL SECTION, PUNNAPPRA, ALAPPUZHA
2. SUDHAKARAN K.K., AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. KOCHUKUNJU, OVERSEAR, KSEB ELECTRICAL SECTION, PUNNAPPRA, ALAPPUZHA
3. SANTHOSHKUMAR, AGED 41 YEARS, LINEMAN, KSEB ELECTRICAL SECTION, TOWN, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case should be continued after the underlying judgment was recalled?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ABDUL KALAM and ORS.
- respondent
RAJKUMAR
Coram
K.VINOD CHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court