Contempt of court case closed as counsel for the petitioner did not intend to press the case after respondent submitted compliance with the underlying writ.
Contempt of court case stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2016/3RD JYAISHTA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 599 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).19938/2015
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19938/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 13-07-2015
PETITIONER(S)/2ND PETITIONER:
H. VISWANATH AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.HARI KUMAR, RESIDING AT LAKSHMI VIHAR, KAVADIYAR PO, TRIVANDRUM-696 003.
BY ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT:
M. NIZARUDHEEN S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED 50 YEARS, SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM CORPORATION, TRIVANDRUM-696 001.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K. SHERIN R BY SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR,SC,TVPM CORPORATION
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-05-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
=====================
Contempt of Court Case No.599 of 2016 - S
================================
Dated this the 24th day of May, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The learned Counsel for the respondent submits that judgment in W.P.(C) No.19938 of 2015 has been complied with. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not intend to press the contempt of court case. Recording the submission, the contempt of court case would stand closed.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN,
JUDGE
SB/24/05/2016
// true copy //
P.A to Judge.
H. VISWANATH
M. NIZARUDHEEN
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
