T. Rajeshwari v. K. Padmakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt case was admitted and disposed of by ordering the respondent to communicate the decision on the petitioner's transfer and eviction within one week, after which the case was closed.
What did the court decide?
Respondent to communicate decision on transfer and eviction within one week; contempt case closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/17TH CHAITHRA, 1938
CON.CASE(C).NO. 541 OF 2016 (S) IN WP(C).22412/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.22412/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 24.07.2015
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
T. RAJESHWARI, AGED 50 YEARS W/O. RAMACHANDRAN KIRAN STEEL INDUSTRIES, MIE, THRIKKOVILVATTAM KANNANALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM - 691 576.
BY ADV. SRI.BASANT BALAJI
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
SHRI.K. PADMAKUMAR FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITONER MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to challenge the decision declining transfer and evicting her.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T. RAJESHWARI
- respondent
SHRI K. PADMAKUMAR
Coram
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court