John Pallippurathu v. T.K.Viswanathan Nair
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/24TH JYAISHTA, 1938 Con.Case(C).No. 516 of 2016 (S) IN OP.8424/2002 -------------------------------------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 8424/2002 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 10.09.2015
PETITIONER(S):
JOHN PALLIPPURATHU S/O. JOSEPH, ELERITHATTU P.O., KASARGOD - 671 314. BY ADVS.SRI.C.K.SREEJITH SRI.S.ASOKAN (K/44/2014)
RESPONDENT(S):
T.K.VISWANATHAN NAIR AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY MANAGING DIRECTOR OF ARALAM FARMING CORPORATION (KERALA) LTD., P.O.ARALAM FARM, KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 673. (ERSTWHILE CENTRAL STATE FARM ARALAM).
R BY SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 516 of 2016 (S) IN OP.8424/2002
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 COPY OF THE ORDER IN OP NO.8424/2002(C) DATED 10.09.15 ON BEHALF OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANNEXURE A3 COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY COMPANY SECRETARY, ARALAM FARMING CORPORATION (KERALA) LTD.
ANNEXURE A4 COPY OF THE PETITIONER SUBMITTED REQUESTING TO PAY THE INTEREST.
ANNEXURE A5 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22.1.16
ANNEXURE A6 COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED PRIOR TO FILING THE CONTEMPT PETITION.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL
// TRUE COPY //
P.A TO JUDGE
SB
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
=====================
Contempt of Court Case No.516 of 2016 - S
=============================== Dated this the 14th day of June, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Both the Counsel submit that Annexure A1 judgment
dated 10.09.2015 has already been complied with.
The contempt of court case hence would stand closed.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
SB/14/06/2016.
// true copy //
P.A to Judge.
John Pallippurathu
T.K. Viswanathan Nair
K. Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court