In a contempt proceeding filed against the petitioner, the court recorded counsel's submission that the impugned order has been complied with, and consequently, the contempt case was closed without any further order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/22ND POUSHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1918 of 2015 (S) IN WP(C).12592/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12592/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 20-08-2015
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WPC:
SATHEESH P.V AGED 40 YEARS S/O.VASU, PROPRIETOR, STAR TRADERS MUNDOOR, THRISSUR PIN 680541, PERINCHERYKALAM HOUSE KOSAVANCODE, THATHAMANGALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT PIN 678102
BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN SRI.B.C.MENON SMT.S.ANJUSHA
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENTS IN THE WPC:
DR.A KOWSIGAN, AGED 39 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR , PIN 680003
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JJJ
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1918 of 2015 (S)
Dated this the 12th day of January, 2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order is complied.
Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
jjj 12/1/16
Satheesh P.V
Dr. A Kowsigan
K.Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
