Sasi K. v. K.R.Jyothilal IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition regarding non-implementation of seniority affirmation. Court ordered respondents to prepare and issue the seniority list within two months. Contempt case closed.
What did the court decide?
Order for preparation and issuance of seniority list within two months; contempt case closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/18TH POUSHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1572 of 2015 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.18295/2006, DATED 02-06-2008
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS 1, 3 & 6 :
1. SASI K., AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.THE LATE PAITHAL K., RESIDING AT KATHIL HOUSE, CHERODE EAST P.O. VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE - 673 529.
2. SHAJAHAN A.K., AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.THE LATE ALIYARKUNJU, RESIDING AT KOIKKALETH HOUSE, PAVUMBA P.O. MANAPPALLY NORTH, KOLLAM- 690 574.
3. PRADEEPAN V.P., AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.SRI.SEKARAN V.P., RESIDING AT 'PRANAVAM HOUSE', PANAGAD P.O., BALUSSERY VIA. KOZHIKODE DISTRICT- 673 612.
- BY ADVS.SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH SRI.JOS LEO JOSE
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the seniority list should be prepared within two months following the affirmation of seniority in the underlying writ petition.
Whether the contempt petition should be closed upon compliance with the court's earlier order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sasi K.
- petitioner
Shajahan A.K.
- petitioner
Pradeepan V.P.
- respondent
K.R. Jyothilal IAS
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court