Shani K.A. v. Amit Meena
Case brief
What is this about?
The court reported that directions in the underlying judgment were complied with. Consequently, the petitioner was allowed to challenge any consequential order, and the contempt case was closed without further adjudication.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/26TH MAGHA, 19372
Con.Case(C).No. 189 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).34497/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 34497/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 16-11-2015 PETITIONER(S):
SHANI K.A. AGED 67 YEARS CHENNANKUNNATH HOUSE, ARIPRA P.O., MANKADA MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, KERALA 686673 (REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY AND FATHER OF THE PETITIONER ABDUL MAJEED K.A., KOLLAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, VENNALA KARA VENNALA P.O., KOCHI, PIN 682028.)
BY ADV. SRI.AVM.SALAHUDIN
RESPONDENT(S):
AMIT MEENA FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, COCHIN 682011
R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.J.MANU RAJ,SC,COCHIN CORPORATION
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SHANI K.A.
- respondent
AMIT MEENA
Coram
V. CHITAMBARESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court