N. Mohanan v. Veena Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt of court case was finally heard. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the case need not proceed as the respondent had complied with the court's direction, upon which the court closed the contempt case.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed as the respondent complied with the direction.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/25TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1869 of 2016 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C).NO. 32086/2015, DATED 15.06.2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER :
M/S. SREE NARAYANA SALES AND SERVICES
INDIAN OIL DEALERS, KOONAMTHAI, EDAPPALLY, COCHIN-24, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER N.MOHANAN, S/O. M.NARAYANAN, AGED 70, SREE NARAYANA SALES AND SERVICES, IOC DEALERS, KOONAMTHAI, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI-682 024.
BY ADVS. SRI.T.B.THANKAPPAN SRI.T.T.HARIKUMAR SRI.ASHISH VIDYADHARAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT NO.1 :
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/S. Sree Narayana Sales and Services
- respondent
Veena Krishnan
Coram
A.M. Shaffique
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court