In a contempt of court case regarding non-compliance with an interim order, the petitioner stated that the sample had already been taken as directed, leading the judge to close the case without further pursuit.
Contempt of court case closed; no further action taken.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/12TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1849 of 2016 () IN WP(C).20280/2016
AGAINST THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 4.10.2016, IN I.A.NO.14799 OF 2016 IN WP(C) 20280/2016 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
M/S.MALABAR CEMENTS LTD, CEMENT GRINDING UNIT, CHERTHALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMPANY SECRETARY SRI.J. SRINIVASA SARAVANAN, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O. M. JAYARAMAN, RESIDING AT 78, TTP MILL ROAD, TIRPUR - 641652, TAMILNADU.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
SRI.P.GOPINATH SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN SRI.KURYAN THOMAS
RESPONDENT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT:
SRI.K.KADIRVEL, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER HEAD, BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI - 682 024.
BY SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 1849 of 2016 () IN WP(C).20280/2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A1: COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 4.10.2016 IN I.A.NO.14799 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.20280 OF 2016
ANNEXURE A2: COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 17.10.2016 SENT BY ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER TO PETITIONER
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
dlk
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O.(C) No.1849 of 2016
Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2016
JUDGMENT
This contempt of court case is filed by the petitioner
complaining that the order dated 4.10.2016 is not
complied with by the respondent.
Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the sample is already
taken in accordance with the directions. Therefore, I do not propose to pursue the contempt of court case any further.
Accordingly, contempt of court case is closed.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY,JUDGE
dlk/3/11/
M/s.Malabar Cements Ltd
K.Kadirdvel
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
