In a contempt case (Civil) No. 1821 of 2016, the petitioner filed a submission that the order in the connected writ petition was complied with. The Court recorded the submission and dismissed the contempt proceedings by closing the case.
Contempt proceedings closed and dismissed upon submission of compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/26TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1821 of 2016 (S) --------------------------------
WP(C) 28375/2016, DATED 02-09-2016
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
MOIDEEN,
S/O.POCKER HAJI, KUZHIKATTUCHOLAKKAL HOUSE, PERUVALLOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:
IBRAHIM KUNHU, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676121.
BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
Con.Case(C).No. 1821 of 2016 (S) --------------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 2/9/16 IN WPC.28375/16 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES ----------------------NIL. / TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1821 of 2016 (S)
Dated: 17th November, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that
the order is complied.
Recording the said submission, the contempt
case is closed.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
jjj 17/11/16
MOIDEEN
IBRAHIM KUNHU
K.VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
