P.P.Joseph v. Mathai
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt of court case, the petitioner submitted that the previous judgment had been complied with, leading to the closure of the contempt proceeding.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/27TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1812 of 2016 (S) IN WP(C).23524/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 23524/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 15-06-2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WP(C) NO 23524 OF 2015:
P.P.JOSEPH,
AGED 48 YEARS, S/O PUNOOSE, POOCHAKKATTIL HOUSE, BRAHMAMANGALAM P.O, CHEMBU VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 6, 3 AND 2 IN WP(C) NO 23524 OF 2015:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.P.JOSEPH
- respondent
MATHAI
- respondent
SMT. CHITHRALEKHA
- respondent
M. MOIDUNNIKUTTY
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court