Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Roland Vs Sajeev — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2016)

Home
Kerala HC
2016
Roland Vs SajeevRoland v. Sajeev

Disposed

Roland v. Sajeev

Kerala HC28 Oct 2016Con.Case(C)/1790/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed contempt case for non-compliance of interim order. Court found directions complied with and closed the case.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/6TH KARTHIKA, 1938

Con.Case(C).No. 1790 of 2016 (S)

AGAINST THE ORDER IN W.P(C).NO. 23827/2016, DATED 31.08.2016

PETITIONER(S)/1ST PETITIONER :

ROLAND, AGED 49 YEARS,

S/O. EASSY, KOIMMAPARAMBIL, AROOR.P.O, CHERTHALA.

BY ADVS. SRI.B.PRAMOD

SMT.R.REJI (ATTINGAL)

RESPONDENT(S)/4TH AND 5TH RESPONDENTS :

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Roland
respondent
Sajeev
respondent
Prathapachandran

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 28 Oct 2016 · October
Registered: 7 Oct 2016
Case no.: Con.Case(C)/1790/2016

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Shaji P.chaly

Jose P.J Vs Binoy Kumar
27 Oct 2016
P v Abdul Salam Vs the Union of India
27 Oct 2016
Chandri R. Vs State of Kerala
27 Oct 2016
Top Constructions Vs Superintending Engineer
28 Oct 2016
Ajith Spices Vs Cochin Port Trust

Cite this judgement

Roland v. Sajeev, Con.Case(C)/1790/2016 (KL), decided on 28 October 2016.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Shaji P. Chaly

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Contempt case closed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

In a contempt of court proceeding concerning non-compliance with an interim order, the court accepted the submission of the respondent that the directions were complied with. The case was closed, with liberty to the petitioner to institute proceedings if aggrieved.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

1. SAJEEV,

(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUTHIATHOD POLICE STATION, CHERTHALA.

2. PRATHAPACHANDRAN,

(AGED AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AROOR POLICE STATION, CHERTHALA.

BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.R.DEEPA

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

Con.Case(C).No. 1790 of 2016 (S)

APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE I: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 31.08.2016 IN W.P(C).NO. 23827/2016 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ANNEXURE II: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.09.2016 SUBMITTED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE III: TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT DATED 18.09.2016. ANNEXURE IV: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20.09.2016 SUBMITTED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE V: TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT DATED 20.09.2016. ANNEXURE VI: PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SPACE IN FRONT OF THE SHOPS.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES :

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A.TO JUDGE

Msd.

SHAJI P. CHALY, J.

Cont. of Court Case (C). No. 1790 OF 2016

Dated this the 28^th day of October, 2016

JUDGMENT

This contempt case is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directions contained in interim order dated 31.08.2016 in W.P.(C). No.23827/2016 are not complied with. Learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that the directions are complied with. I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt case any further.

Therefore, contempt of court case is closed, leaving open the liberty of the petitioner, if aggrieved to institute any proceedings.

SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE

DCS

Shaji P. Chaly

CNR

KLHC010124772016

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

Disposal

CLOSED

28 Oct 2016

Kuruvila Abraham Vs Union of India

28 Oct 2016