Soli v. Kurian v Joby
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1769 of 2016 (S)
----------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 11630/2016 DATED 28/03/2016)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
SOLI V. KURIAN, AGED 51 YEARS, W/O. (LATE) BABU VARGHESE, ARECKAL HOUSE, ALLAPRA P.O., ERNAKULAM DT -683 556
BY ADVS.SRI.AVANEESH KOYIKKARA SRI.LINDONS C.DAVIS
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT :
JOBY, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), CONVENER, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, KEZHILLAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DT -683 541
BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.GOPINATHAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC.NO.1769/2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX A A CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC.NO.11630/2016 DATED 28/03/2016.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.S.TO JUDGE
sts
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
=========================
C.O.(C).No.1769/2016
Dated this the 5th day of December, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
directions in the judgment have been complied with. Recording the
said submission, the contempt of court case is closed.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
ms
Soli V. Kurian
Joby
A.Muhamed Mustaque
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court