Joy v. Saheed
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner approached this court seeking stay of recovery proceedings pending disposal of applications to set aside an ex parte award before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Attingal. The court directed the Tribunal to decide the pending applications within two months.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Attingal to consider and pass orders on pending applications to set aside ex parte award and condone delay within two months; stayed recovery proceeding
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
OP (MAC).No. 3730 of 2012 (O)
IA.NO.4071/2012 & IA.NO.4070/2012 IN OP(MV)1487/2002 OF MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, ATTINGAL
PETITIONER(S):
JOY, S/O.RAJAN CHETTIYAR, JOY BHAVAN, MUTTAPPALAM P.O. CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE, THACHODU, VARKALA.
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
1. SAHEED, S/O.ABDUL KARIM, THARATTAYIL CHARUVILA VEEDU, CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE, VADASSERIKONAM-695014.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal shall consider and pass orders on the pending applications to set aside an ex parte award and condone delay within a specified time limit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JOY, S/O.RAJAN CHETTIYAR
- respondent
1. SAHEED, S/O.ABDUL KARIM
- respondent
THE MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court