The petitioner submitted compliance with the impugned judgment in W.P.(C). 17843/2016. The High Court allowed the compliance and dismissed the contempt petition, closing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/17TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1768 of 2016 (S)
JUDGMENT DATED 20-05-2016 IN WP(C) 17843/2016
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
C.K. INDIRABHAI,
AGED 65 YEARS, W/O. E.P. RAGHAVAN PILLAI, EZHUTHANATH SREENILAYAM HOUSE, PAYIPPAD P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 537.
BY ADVS.SRI.AVANEESH KOYIKKARA SRI.LINDONS C.DAVIS
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT:
HAIRUNISA M.K.,
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER CONVENER, LOCAL LEVEL MONITIRING COMMITTEE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER KRISHI BHAVAN, PAIPPAD, NALUKODI P.O. - 686 548.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
msv/
Con.Case(C).No. 1768 of 2016 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE A: A CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC.17843/2016 DTD.20.5.2016.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURE
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.S.TO JUDGE
msv/
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
===================== Contempt of Court Case No.1768 of 2016 - S in W.P.(C) No.17843 of 2016
=============================== Dated this the 08th day of November, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Annexure A judgment dated 20.05.2016 has already been
complied with.
The contempt of court case hence would stand closed.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
SB/08/11/2016.
// true copy //
P.A to Judge
C.K. INDIRABHAI
HAIRUNISA M.K.
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
