Disposed

Francis Stanley v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC4 Nov 2016WP(C)/28952/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition was disposed of without any observation on merits as the prayer was confined. The Court directed the Second Respondent to consider the Petitioner's application within one month of the receipt of this judgment.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 2nd Respondent to consider the Petitioner's application within one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

Francis Stanley Vs State of Kerala — Kerala HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/13TH KARTHIKA, 1938

¶5

WP(C).No. 28952 of 2016 (T) ----------------------------

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

FRANCIS STANLEY, AGED 50 YEARS S/O.KR. STANLEY,KURUPPASSERRY HOUSE, PALLIPORT PO, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN 683515

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.SHAIJAN C.GEORGE SRI.C.K.SAJEEV SMT.SAJITHA GEORGE SRI.M.T.AJITH

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001

¶11

2. EZHIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, EZHIKKARA PO, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, 683515

¶12

R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN

¶13

R1 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.J.MANURAJ

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

WP(C).No. 28952 of 2016 (T)

¶16

APPENDIX

¶17

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶18

EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE OWNER SHIP CERTIFICATE DATED 14.08.1995 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

¶19

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 14.08.1995 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

¶20

EXHIBIT P2 (A) TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 31.03.1998 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

¶21

EXHIBIT P2 (B) THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 22.07.2005 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

¶22

EXHIBIT P2 (C) THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 14.10.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

¶23

EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 02.08.2016 FILED BY TEH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT

¶24

EXHIBIT P3 (A) THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 03.08.2016 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

¶25

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

¶31

W.P.(C) No. 28952 of 2016 (T)

¶32

Dated: 4^th November, 2016

¶33

J U D G M E N T

¶34

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P3

¶35

application dated 02.08.2016 has not been considered till date by the 2^nd respondent.

¶36

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 2^nd respondent to consider the application, in accordance with law, within one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

¶37

The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 2^nd respondent.

¶38

Sd/K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE

¶39

jjj 4/11/16

Francis Stanley v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Francis Stanley v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mathukutty Vs Rajkumar

Nirmala Salim Vs the Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat

Abraham K.V. Vs the State of Kerala

Krishnankutty Vs the State Enviornmenta Impact Assessment Authoirty

Kumari Vijayan Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

M.Unnikrishnan Vs K.K.Manoj, Secretary, Kottakkal Municipality