delinquencies on the part of that teacher will not amount to a situation of any violation of Anx.I order by the respondent herein. Moreover, the incumbent to whom Anx.III show cause notice has been issued, is not the petitioner, but some other person. Therefore, it is not right and proper for this Court to entertain this contempt petition in a matter like this, which affects the smooth conduct and running of the school, and it is for the petitioner to make necessary motion either for appropriate further interim orders or for disposal of the main matter. The aforesaid observations have been made by this Court hereinabove, as this Court has been constrained to decide whether the issuance of Anx.III show cause notice would amount to violation of Anx.I interim order. So it is only to be observed that those findings in this Contempt Petition will have no bearing on any issues to be decided either at the interlocutory stage or final stage of the W.P.(C). In the light of these aspects, this Court is constrained to take the view that this Contempt Petition cannot be entertained and accordingly, the same stands dismissed. All the contentions of both sides on the matters in the W.P.(C). are left open to be decided in the writ proceedings.
