Liji Devassy v. Valsala C.A
Case brief
What is this about?
Court fixed 10 days for respondent to explain non-compliance. Respondent filed affidavit. Petitioner counsel sought closure of contempt petition with liberty to challenge a subsequent order.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed with liberty to petitioner to challenge the order dated 1.9.2016.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/11TH ASWINA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1579 of 2016 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.20118/2016 DATED 16-06-2016.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WP(C).:
LIJI DEVASSY, H.S.A. (MAL), AGED 39 YEARS, D/O. K.A. DEVASSI, ST. JOSEPH'S HIGH SCHOOL, KIZHAKKAMBALAM, RESIDING AT KURUNGAMPILLI HOUSE, ERUMATHALA, CHUNANGAMVELI-683 105.
BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF.
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WP(C).:
VALSALA C.A., (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALUVA-682 315.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition filed for enforcement of a previous judgment should be closed?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
LIJI DEVASSY
- respondent
VALSALA C.A.
Coram
ALEXANDER THOMAS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court