Suseela v. Dr P v Balachandran
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners submitted that directions in a prior judgment in WP(C) No. 21768 of 2015 were complied with. The court accepted this submission and closed the contempt case.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed on acceptance that the petitioner complied with prior directions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/28TH POUSHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1690 of 2015 (S)
------------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 21768/2015 DATED 20-07-2015)
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS IN WP(C):
1. SUSEELA,AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.PODIYAN, ANIL BHAVAN, NELLIKUNNAM P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
2. K.VINOD, AGED 39 YEARS,S/O.A.KUMARAN, NIRAPPUVILA PUTHANVEEDU, CHEPRA P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN,SENIOR ADVOCATE ADV. SMT.P.R.REENA
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN THE WP(C):
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suseela
- petitioner
K. Vinod
- respondent
Dr. P.V. Balachandran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court