Varghese M.O v. Kishore
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner alleged non-compliance with an order. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order has been complied with. The court closed the contempt case on this submission.
What did the court decide?
Case closed on submission of compliance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/3RD KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1688 of 2016 (S)
AGAINST THE ORDER IN W.P(C).NO. 30098/2016. DATED 08-09-2016
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER :
VARGHESE M.O, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O. OUSEPH, MANDY HOUSE, CHIRANGARA, KORATTY SOUTH P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 308.
BY ADV. SRI.S.RENJITH
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1, 4, 5, 7 :
1. KISHORE, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER , THE GEOLOGIST, MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT OFFICE, MUNICIPAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, T.B.ROAD, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 014.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VARGHESE M.O
- respondent
KISHORE
- respondent
DR. SRINIVAS A.
- respondent
REGI SIMON
- respondent
K.M.GOPAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court