“These matters have been heard in extenso. It is brought to notice by Sri.Tony George Kannanthanam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in W.P.(C). No.7160/2012 (Corporate Manager concerned), that the proposals for appointments of about 79 teaching and non-teaching incumbents made by the Corporate Manager have been deferred from consideration by the Educational Officer concerned, in view of the dispute raised by the present Rule 51B claimant herein and all those appointees have been working without salary. It is further submitted by Sri.Tony George Kannanthanam, learned counsel, that the Corporate Manager has kept vacant one post of L.P.S.A in St. Francis L.P.School, Wadakkancherry, Thrissur District, so that in case this Court ultimately finds that the above said Rule 51B claim is to be upheld, then that claimant could be considered for accommodation in that vacancy instead of keeping all the 79 proposals for appointments pending. This submission made by Sri.Tony George Kannanthanam, learned counsel, is not opposed by Sri.V.A.Mohammed, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent in that Writ Petition or by the Government Pleader or any of the other parties concerned. In view of the above, it is ordered that the aforesaid Corporate Manager shall not fill up the above said post of L.P.S.A in St. Francis L.P.School, Wadakkancherry, Thrissur, until further orders. Consequently, it is ordered that the educational authorities will be at liberty to proceed further for consideration of the approval of the proposals of all other appointments made by the Corporate Manager which are now kept pending in view of the above said dispute. The proposals for such appointments including that of various parties in these Writ Petitions should be considered by the educational authorities concerned and orders should be passed thereon without further delay at least within a period of three weeks
