T.K.Sasi v. v.Chandrasekharan
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, the petitioner sought closure as the respondents conceded that the impugned penalty order was cancelled, though the dropping of Rule 18 proceedings remained unaltered, leading the Court to close the matter.
What did the court decide?
The contempt of court case stands closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/4TH BHADRA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1369 of 2016 (S) IN Crl.MC.2706/2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN Crl.MC 2706/2015 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 18-08-2015
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
1. T.K.SASI S/O LATE T.S.KRISHNAN, AGED:56 YEARS, SREE NILAYAM, POST, EDATHITTA, KODUMON VIA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, (RED.AS ASST. ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, PULLADU SECTION, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST.`
BY ADVS.SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI
SRI.JEEVAN MATHEW MANAYANI
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT 3&4:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.K.SASI
- respondent
V.CHANDRASEKHARAN
- respondent
AJITH BHAGAVATH RAO PATTEL
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court