In this contempt petition alleging non-compliance by a bank with prior directions, the court accepted a letter offering an installment payment plan as evidence of compliance and disposed of the matter.
Contempt case closed as respondent's offer of installment payments deemed compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/25TH SRAVANA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1312 of 2016 (S)
----------------------------------------------THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.15275/2016 DATED 19-04-2016.
PETITIONER:
PHILIPOSE MATHEW, AGED 85 YEARS, S/O.MATHTHU, EZHAVAKKATTU MANCHA HOUSE, PARIPPU, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 014.
BY ADVS.SRI.NIXON PAUL, SRI.E.S.SANEEJ.
RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT IN WP(C).NO.15275/2016:
JINSON, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, BRANCH MANAGER, UCO BANK, THIRUVALLA BRANCH, CROSS JUNCTION, M.C. ROAD, THIRUVALLA-686 001.
BY ADV. SRI.DEEPAK JOY K., SC.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
Con.Case(C).No. 1312 of 2016 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:-
ANNEXURE 1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19/04/2016 IN WP(C).NO.15275/2014 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. ANNEXURE 2 COPY OF THE RECEIPT PAYMENT TO THE RESPONDENT BANK DATED 13/05/2016.
ANNEXURE 3 COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 15/06/2016.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
rs.
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
Contempt Case No.1312 of 2016 ---------------------------------------------Dated this the 16th day of August, 2016
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has filed this contempt of court case, stating
that the judgment of this Court with certain directions to the bank is not complied with by the respondent.
Contempt case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
sab
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent bank has complied with the court order by providing instalment payment scheme.
Philipose Mathew
Jinson
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
