In a contempt case alleging non-compliance with a previous judgment, the court held that the respondent produced an order complying with the direction. Consequently, the court found no reason to pursue the case further and closed the matter.
Contempt case closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST 2016/10TH SRAVANA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1255 of 2016 (S)
------------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 19622/2016 DATED 08-06-2016)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
JOMY DEVASSY, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.DEVASSY, MANJOORAN HOUSE, CHUNANGAMVELI, ERUMATHALA P.O, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN
RESPONDENT :
SADIQUE ALI, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER CUM SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM -682 030.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC.NO.1255/2016
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
| ANNEX A1 | COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 8/6/2016 IN WPC.NO.19622/2016. |
|---|---|
| ANNEX A2 | COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 11/7/2016 |
| ANNEX A3 | COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 18/07/2016 |
| ANNEX A4 | COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY THE RESPONDENT |
RESPONDENT' ANNEXURES:
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
C.O.C. No.1255 of 2016
Dated this the 1st day of August, 2016
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed by the petitioner alleging that the direction issued by this court in Annexure A1 judgment was not complied with by the respondent.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
smv 01.08.2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should continue given that the respondent has filed an order complying with the court direction.
Jomy Devassy
SADIQUE ALI
Shaji P.Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
