Dr.Zeenath K.S. v. Mohamed Basheer .K
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a contempt case after both parties submitted that the earlier order directions were complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/21ST MAGHA, 1937
Con.Case(C).No. 1166 of 2015 (S)
WP(C) 32044/2014, DATED 20-02-2015
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
DR.ZEENATH K.S., ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, INSTITUTE OF DISTANT EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, SENATE HALL CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 034.
BY ADVS.SMT.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH SRI.M.JAYAKRISHNAN SRI.ACHUTH KYLAS
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT IN WRIT PETITION:
MOHAMED BASHEER .K, REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 034.
BY SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
Con.Case(C).No. 1166 of 2015 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1 : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20/2/15 IN WPC.32044/14
ANNEXURE A2 : COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 1/12/14 IN WPC.32044/14
ANNEXURE A3: COPY OF THE IA.7293/15 IN WPC.32044/14
ANNEXURE A4: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 7/8/15 REMINDING THE RESPONDENT TO COMPLY THE DIRECTION ISSUED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES
NIL.
/ TRUE COPY /
P.S. TO JUDGE
PJ
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
C.O.(C).No.1166/2015
Dated this the 10th Day of February, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Both sides submit that the directions in the
judgment have been complied with. Accordingly, the
Contempt of Court Case is closed.
Sd/A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
ms
Dr. Zeenath K.S.
Mohamed Basheer .K
A. Muhamed Mustaque
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court