P.P.Baiju v. Rajamanikkam
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed a contempt of court case filed for alleged non-compliance of directions in a writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of court case closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/5TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1142 of 2016 (S)
------------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 16198/2016 DATED 29-04-2016)
---------------------
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
P.P.BAIJU, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O. POULOSE, PARAPUZHA HOUSE, POOVATHUSSERY P.O., THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS :
1. SRI. RAJAMANIKKAM, IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, CHAIRMAN, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM-682030. (NAME OF FATHER AND AGE IS NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER).
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.P.BAIJU
- respondent
SRI. RAJAMANIKKAM
- respondent
SRI.P.UNNIRAJAN
- respondent
SRI. K.G.SAMUEL
- respondent
SRI. M.SURESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court