Parameswaran v. R.P.Suresh
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt of court case, the petitioner submitted that the court's previous direction in W.P.(C). No.2344 of 2016 was complied with. The court accepted this submission.
In this contempt of court case, the petitioner submitted that the court's previous direction in W.P.(C). No.2344 of 2016 was complied with. The court accepted this submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/5TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1010 of 2016 (S)
WP(C) 2344/2016 DATED 08-02-2016
-------------
PETITIONER:
PARAMESWARAN,
S/O PONNU, GED 64 YEARS, PRIYA NIVAS, VETTEKKATTU KULAMBU, THATHAMANGALAM, PALAKKAD
BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. R.P.SURESH,
2. P.RAVEENDRAN,
3. MARYKUTTY I.A.S,
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI S.GOPINATHAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.V.
COC NO 1010 OF 2016:
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES:
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
K.V.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
Cont.Case (C).No.1010 of 2016
Dated this the 27th day of October, 2016
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted that the direction contained in W.P.(C). No.2344 of 2016 has been complied. Hence, the contempt of court case is closed.
Sd/-
(A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE)
TRUE COPY
P.A TO JUDGE
DG
PARAMESWARAN
R.P.SURESH
P.RAVEENDRAN
MARYKUTTY I.A.S
A.MUHAMMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court