V.K.Mohammed Salih v. Arif Lohani
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt proceedings were closed after counsel submitted that the directions of the judgment in W.P(C) No.31525/2013 dated 04.03.2014 had been complied with by the respondents.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
Con.Case(C).No. 1017 of 2015 (S)
----------------------------------------------THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.31525/2013 DATED 04-03-2014.
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 17, 18, 19 & 22:
1. V.K. MOHAMMED SALIH, PF CODE NO.3265/533, S/O.KOCHUNNI, AGED 63, VELEEPARAMBIL HOUSE, NETTOOR P.O., MARADU VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR, KOCHI.
2. C.K. SREEDEVI,
PF CODE NO.3265/581, W/O.A.G. MENON, AGED 63, "USHUS", 34/2219, MAMANGALAM, PALARIVATTOM, EDAPPILLY (S) VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR, KOCHI.
3.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.K. Mohammed Salih & Ors.
- respondent
Arif Lohani & Ors.
Coram
K. Vinod Chandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court