Petitioner in bail application sought permission to withdraw. Court granted permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/18TH PHALGUNA, 1937
Bail Appl..No. 591 of 2016 ()
CRIME NO. 43/2016 OF NEYYATTINKARA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT
PETITIONER/A1:
S.R.SUDEESH KUMAR, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.S.R.SURENDRAN, POIKA, KANNIPURAM, NEYYATTINKARA.
BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SARIN
RESPONDENT/STATE:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEYYATTINKARA POLICE STATION, BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA.T.Y.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
SUNIL THOMAS, J.
B.A.No.591 of 2016
Dated this the 8th day of March, 2016
ORDER
When the matter was taken up, the learned Counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the bail application. Permission granted and the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE
AD
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
S.R.SUDEESH KUMAR
STATE OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
