The petitioner, an accused in a criminal case, sought to withdraw a bail application which was then dismissed on the application for withdrawal being accepted.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/20TH SRAVANA, 1938
Bail Appl..No. 2412 of 2016 ()
CRIME NO. 45/2016 OF SREEKRISHNAPURAM POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD.
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:
MUHAMMED ASHKAR, S/O. NOORUDHEEN, AGED 23 YEARS, PAARAKKAPALLIYALIL HOUSE, SREEKRISHNAPURAM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678 582.
BY ADV. SRI.T.K.SANDEEP.
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/STATE:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.REMA. R.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
P.UBAID, J.
~~~~~~~~~~
B.A No. 2412 of 2016
~~~~~~~~~~~
Dated this the 11th August, 2016
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the application. The submission is accepted. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
P.UBAID JUDGE
ma
/True copy/
P.S to Judge
MUHAMMED ASHKAR
STATE OF KERALA
P. UBAID
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
